WHO IS THE MESSIAH?
Do you really believe that the billions of stars in the heavens were made just for us to look at? The stars were not made just for us to look at, but, rather, contain the innumerable worlds and beings in Yahweh’s perfect and unfallen creation.
The earth was reformed after the destruction of the great rebellion (in which, by the way, we were involved) as a prison and correctional facility for all the fallen spirits that participated in Satan’s rebellion when she offered us the knowledge of evil - the materialistic realm. Your heart may revolt at this, but let me assure you that it is the truth.
Have you ever met a man or a woman that did not have a character flaw? Why do we seek glory and desire to be worshipped, to have big jobs, big houses, fancy cars, and the admiration of others? Why do we crave perfection in our surroundings? Why can’t we find contentment in stuff, no matter how big the pile? The simple truth is that we once possessed glory and lived in total contentment, in Yahweh’s perfect universe, and now we seek these things in the materialistic realm of this world where they just do not exist.
Yahweh’s original creation is not just good; it is a perfect society, in which there is no crime, disharmony, or discontentment of any kind, and all that remain therein are sinless and perfect and everlasting.
You see, we (our spirits) have existed for many eons. We were created perfect, part of Yahweh’s perfect universe. But Satan became greedy, wanting to be Yahweh. Satan began deceiving the people, telling us lies about Yahweh and our condition in Heaven. Some accepted what she said willingly and joined in her rebellion. Others also accepted and joined in, but were deceived into doing so.
As Yahweh cannot allow sin in Heaven, all those that participated in the rebellion were cast out, into Hell – separated for the first time in our existence from Yahweh and all that we knew.
However, Yahweh being a merciful creator, made a way for us to be redeemed and to be enabled to return to our places in Heaven. It requires the trying of our spirits to see, if given the opportunity, we will REPENT of our rebellion and turn back to Yahweh and keep his laws. To give us this opportunity the earth was restored as a prison planet – a place to send our fallen spirits. God placed our spirits in animal bodies (intelligent evolution) and put us in the necessary circumstances to judge us and see what is in the heart of every man woman and child. To do this requires us to have the freedom to choose good or evil and this necessitates that both good and evil must be allowed to exist on the planet. Evil needs no explanation as it is ever present everywhere we look; however, good must be sought out.
Yahweh in His mercy gave mankind laws to follow in each dispensation to draw us closer to perfection. However, because fallen men’s minds are polluted, most men not only do not obey Yahweh’s laws, but many try to change or do away with them as they are able.
After Yahweh gave Moses His laws for His chosen people to follow, over time they, too, were corrupted by wicked men.
1. THIS BRINGS US TO YAHWEH’S SON THE MESSIAH, WHOSE NAME IS Y'SHUA, NOT JESUS, AND WHO’S PURPOSE IN COMING WAS TO BRING THE PERFECT TRUTH OF YAHWEH’S LAWS TO HIS PEOPLE.
Y'SHUA, IN OBEDIENCE TO HIS FATHER, WILLINGLY LEFT HEAVEN AND CAME TO EARTH AND WAS ROBED IN HUMAN FLESH. NOT MANY UNDERSTAND THE SACRIFICE THAT Y'SHUA MADE WHEN HE ALLOWED YAHWEH TO PLACE HIS SPIRIT IN THE WOMB OF MARY TO BE BORN A HUMAN BEING, THE SON OF JOSEPH AND MARY AND TO LIVE AS ALL OTHER MEN MUST LIVE ON THIS PLANET. HE WAS THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF YAHWEH AS HE WAS THE ONLY UNFALLEN SON OF YAHWEH TO WILLINGLY LEAVE HIS PLACE IN THE HEAVENS AND COME TO EARTH EVEN THOUGH HE HAD NO SIN. HE LEFT THE GLORY THAT HE HAD WITH YAHWEH IN HIS HEAVENLY ESTATE AND CAME TO EARTH TO BRING LIFE AND IMMORTALITY TO LIGHT.
John 8:42, Y'shua said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Yahweh; neither came I of myself, but he sent me."
John 6:38, "For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me."
Luke 1:30-31, "And the angel said to her, Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with (Yahweh), and behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name (Y'shua)."
God the Father cannot be tempted with evil, as He determines what is good or evil; however, since His Son Y'shua is created, he is a free moral agent as we. Therefore, he could be tempted in all points as we, to disobey his Father's commands, yet he did not sin.
Jas. 1:13, "Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of (Yahweh): for (Yahweh) cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:"
Luke 4:1-2, "And Y'shua being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, being forty days tempted of the devil."
Heb. 4:15, "For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin." (Also see: Isa. 28:16)
Y'shua was prophesied to come in many Old Testament scriptures in the Bible. Some of these have been altered by the Catholics. My favorite: Isa. 9:2, 6, "The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light; they that dwelt in the land of the shadow of death, upon them has the light shined. - For unto us a child is born, and unto us A SON is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called, Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty one, Father of the Age to come, Prince of Peace."
The purpose of his coming was to bring the true teachings of Yahweh’s laws to his chosen people and to not only teach these laws, but to actually live them as a witness to mankind that we can live sinless in this present world. He did not do away with Yahweh’s laws, but rather brought them to perfection by teaching us that if we love Yahweh with all our heart and love our neighbors as ourselves then we have kept all of Yahweh’s laws. If we love Yahweh with all our heart, then we will not worship any false Gods, if we love our neighbor as ourselves, we will not bear false witness against him, nor will we commit adultery with his wife, nor yet fornicate with his daughter, nor yet will we covet anything that is his, so we will not steal from him, neither will we lie to him, nor do anything to harm him. If we, by the power and anointing of the Holy Spirit, keep these two laws then we have peace once again with Yahweh, as HIS LAW’S ONLY PURPOSE IS TO BRING PEACE AND HARMONY TO ALL HIS CREATURES. HIS LAWS ARE NOT SENT NOT TO MAKE US SLAVES TO RITUALS AND TEMPLES AND PRIESTS.
Since Y'shua was tempted in all points as we, he has gained the experience to help each of us to live as he did without sin in this present world, which is the only way we can be allowed to return back home to the heavens where we belong.
Enoch's description of Yahweh and of The Son of Man. Enoch 46:1, "There I beheld the Ancient of Days, whose head was like white wool, and with him another, whose countenance resembled that of man. His countenance was full of grace, like that of one of the Holy Angels. Then I inquired of one of the Angels, who went with me, and showed me every secret thing, concerning this Son of Man; who he was, whence he was, and why he accompanied the Ancient of days. (Jn.17:3, Dan. 7:9) He answered and said to me: This is the Son of Man, to whom righteousness belongs; with whom righteousness has dwelt; and WHO WILL REVEAL ALL THE TREASURES OF THAT WHICH IS CONCEALED; for the Lord of Spirits has chosen him; and his portion has surpassed all before the Lord of Spirits in everlasting uprightness."
John 12: 46-50, “I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness…”
John 8:12, “Then spake Y'shua again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.”
John 9:5, “As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
John 1:17, “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Y'shua.
Matt. 4:16-17, “The people which sat in darkness saw great light; and to them which sat in the region and shadow of death light is sprung up. From that time Y'shua began to preach, and to say, REPENT: for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.”
John 1:4-5, “In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”
John 5:24-25, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.”
luke 1:73-79, “The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life. And thou, child, shalt be called the PROPHET of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; To give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins, Through the tender mercy of our God; whereby the dayspring from on high hath visited us, To give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace.”
2. Y'SHUA IS OUR SOON COMING KING.
Rev. 19:11-16, "And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of (Yahweh). And the armies, which were in heaven, followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of (Yahweh). And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS."
3. THE MESSIAH’S NAME IS NOT JESUS.
We must understand that when Saul brought his corrupted Gentile version of Y'shua’s teachings to Rome, although there were still temples to Diana and Zeus, the main religion already in place was Mithraism which was the culmination of and included all of the Pagan worship and false deities that had come before it. In what became the norm in latter Catholicism, the old religion was simply melded with the new religion.
It is believed that the Hebrew name of Y'shua was changed into the Greek “IESOUS” at this time. Their false God could not be called by a Jewish name because it would not be acceptable to Saul’s New Greek religion, nor to the Romans who considered the Jews slaves.
The Romans further corrupted the name to IESUS, which was later altered to Jesus after the letter J was added to the English Language, about 500 years ago.
In Hebrew the Father’s name is YHVH or YHWH which we pronounce YAHWEH and the Son’s name is Y'SHUA, bar YOSEF which means deliverance, help, and salvation, the Son of Joseph.
“In modern Hebrew Y'shua’s name is pronounced and written Yeshu which may have been the ancient pronunciation in the Galilee area. Yeshua and Yoshua (and Yahshua) are from the same root Hebrew words (YUD-‘AYIN-Y-W-‘) which means He will save.”
Dr. David H Stern
WE KNOW FROM SCRIPTURE THAT HE WAS CALLED RABBONI BY HIS CLOSEST FOLLOWERS; SEE JOHN 20:16, WHERE MARY MAGDALENE ADDRESSED THE SPIRITUAL Y'SHUA BY THIS TERM, WHICH MEANS MASTER, TEACHER.
“The Greek name for Jesus, IESOUS (Savior), shows a remarkable similarity to the masculine form of the name of the healing goddess IASO, pronounced IESO in Ionic Greek. There is also a strong connection with the names of the sons of Zeus (IASUS, IASION, AND IASIUS). Another spelling of the name is IHSOUS, the IHS became associated with IESOUS as Savior of humanity, but IHS was already a title of Bacchus…”
Michael Robison
THE FACT IS THAT THE MESSIAH'S NAME NEVER WAS ‘JESUS’ AND THAT THE NAME ‘JESUS’ IS ACTUALLY AN INVENTION OF THE HARLOT CHURCH.
“In Luke 4:27 we find Elisha’s (Eli’Shuah) name changed to El-I-se’us (Eli’Zeus) meaning (My god is Zeus). If they will corrupt a Prophets name how much more the name of Y'shua.
‘It is of interest to note that the first two printings of the King James Bible did not contain the name of Jesus as the letter (J) did not exist until the 16th century. There is still no letter “J” in Hebrew.
“’Je-SUS’ is pronounced Gee-SOOCE and this is from the Latin word/name ‘Ie-SUS’ pronounced Ee-SOOCE.
“Sadly, a case can be made that ‘Jesus’, in Latin, actually means 'Pig'.
As an old farm boy I am well acquainted with calling hogs with the words Soo and Sooie but I never knew where they came from until now.
In Greek, the messiah’s name is Iesous. Iesous or ‘hey-soos’ in Hebrew it means “hey leaping horse’. Just look at this example: Ps.33:17, ‘a horse (Strong’s Heb. word 5483) (Heb. hey-soos/Grk. Iesous/ Eng. Jesus) is a vain hope for safety; neither shall he deliver any by his great strength.’
“Jesus is a corrupted name derived from the Greek IESOUS. Ies, or iysh in Hebrew means man, while sus -soos means leaping horse, so when you speak that name, you are referring to the Messiah as ‘man horse’ or ‘man beast’.
“The name Jesus in Welch is IESU. Jesus in Romanian is ISUS. Jesus in Polish is JEZUS.
“Did you know that there was a Celtic demon god by the name ‘ESUS’ pronounced Ee-SOOCE also known as ‘HESUS’, pronounced He or Hey-SOOCE. This god was worshipped by the ancient Druids. This ‘ESUS’ was found on a relief on an altar of ZEUS that was found in Paris in the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Notre Dame. (Encyclopedia Britannica Macromedia page 575) On this relief you can see that on ‘ESUS’S chest there is a CROSS.” (Dictionary of Pagan Religions page 117 and page 152).
I THINK IT IS MORE THAN OBVIOUS THAT JOSEPH AND MARY DID NOT NAME THEIR HEBREW SON AFTER A GREEK GOD NAMED ZEUS.
EVEN THOUGH THE VARIOUS CORRUPTIONS OF THE MESSIAH'S NAME HAVE BEEN INGRAINED IN PEOPLE FOR TWO THOUSAND YEARS, HOW CAN WE, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, FAIL TO TEACH THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS NAME?
Recently, an ossuary (bone box) was discovered, dated to around 62-63 AD, and authenticated by numerous scholars. On it was an Aramaic inscription that read, “Ya'akov, bar Yosef, akhui di Yoshua”, translated as, “James, son of Joseph, brother of (Yoshua)”. This is believed to be the burial box of James the brother of Y'shua.
The cross, it turns out, come also from Paganism. The worship of Asherah, which Yahweh dealt with repeatedly in Israel, was called an abomination and involved the use of a cross to determine the solstice days with its shadow. On these solstice days, different aspects of the story of Nimrod and Semiramus were played out. The first solstice involved intercourse between a chosen man and the current temple priestess and the death of Nimrod (which included the actual death and bloody dismemberment of the chosen man which was accomplished in front of the cross (The Crucifixion). The next solstice day, the winter solstice day (Christmas), A baby was born in front of the cross (Tammuz). These Asherah crosses or poles were even set up in Yahweh’s temple courtyard and were called an abomination by Yahweh.
THE MESSIAH’S NAME IS Y'SHUA - NOT ZEUS (JESUS). Y'SHUA IS THE NAME THAT HE WAS KNOWN BY. AS IMPORTANT, IF NOT MORE SO, IS THE FACT THAT (YHWH) YAHWEH’S (OUR HEAVENLY FATHERS) NAME HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH LORD AND GOD IN OVER SIX THOUSAND PLACES IN THE BIBLE.
It is also of note that the only song that is sung the same in every language on the earth is Halleluyah which means praise Yah.
4. Y'SHUA WAS NOT BORN OF A VIRGIN.
This myth is found in most of the pagan god mythologies and in the case of Jesus, came from Mithraism. There are no less than sixteen god-man redeemers recorded in history all of whom were born of a virgin on or around the day of winter solstice.
The Virgin Birth - in our discussion of this subject, let me say that for thirty years I believed the orthodox position. I simply never questioned it. Now however, I must respond to what I believe are Yahweh's promptings to discard this position in favor of the truth. It is obvious even with just a precursory look at this to see that like so many other Catholic teachings it is error.
IF Y'SHUA WAS BORN OF A VIRGIN, THEN HE IS NOT A SON OF DAVID OR THE LION OF THE TRIBE OF JUDAH AS MARY WAS OF THE TRIBE OF LEVI AS WAS HER COUSIN ELIZABETH. LUKE 1:5.
The book of Matthew begins with the genealogy of Y'shua, which lists Joseph’s ancestors from Abraham on down, not Mary’s. (Also see Acts 2:30 and Rom. 1:3)
If you stop at verse 17 in chapter 1 and pick up again at the beginning of chapter 2 you will see that it fits together like a glove. Verse 18 through verse 25 tells the Catholic story of Joseph and Mary and the miraculous impregnation of Mary by God, this being required to fulfill the supposed prophecy of Isaiah in chap. 7:14. However, if we really look at this prophecy we find that it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Messiah. This child was a sign from Yahweh that the enemies of Ahaz, Ephraim and Syria, would be defeated before this child was old enough to choose good from evil. In the very next chapter of Isaiah we find another child given for a sign from God. This is not including the fact that the word translated ‘virgin’ in Isa. 7:14 is a mistranslation of Strong’s word 3959 (which occurs only one other time in the Bible - in Gen. 24:43 (RSV), concerning Isaac’s future wife, and was translated as a ‘young woman’). The translation of this word as ‘virgin’ in Isa. 7:14 is very strange considering there is a Hebrew word for ‘virgin’ that is used twenty-four times in the scripture. That word is Strong’s word 1330.
This error has been corrected in most other modern Bible translations where it is translated as young woman. We cannot find any prophecy anywhere that requires that Yahweh impregnate Mary who, by the way, is a man’s wife.
IT IS ALSO VERY INTERESTING THAT JOSEPH’S AND MARY’S CHILD WAS NOT NAMED IMMANUEL IF ISA. 7:14 WAS REFERRING TO THE MESSIAH.
We do not have to look far to find the reason for this corrupt teaching and its result. It is none other than the unholy Catholic Church whose primary reason for existence is to restore again the false religion of Paganism. Many of the gods and goddesses of paganism, including its founder Semiramis, were all involved with ‘virgin’ births. In her case, Tammuz was born of an ‘immaculate conception’ between her and her dead husband Nimrod which is, of course, where the Catholics found the teaching of God manifest or incarnate as His own son.
As to the result of this false teaching of the Virgin Birth and all that follows it - the Immaculate Conception, the Deification of Mary as the Mother of God, and the ascension of Mary into Heaven, we need look no further than the fact that one-sixth of the population of the planet worships Mary as the mother of God, which is actually Satan worship and the very pinnacle of Pagan idolatry. See image of Jealousy - Ezek. 8:3, 5, Dan. 11:31, 12:11.
For an exhaustive treatise on the subject of Catholic Paganism and Mariology please read Alexander Hislops “Two Babylons”.
The miracle in Yeshua's birth was that Yahweh took the unfallen spirit of his Son Y'shua, and placed it in that little body that was conceived by Joseph and Mary. If you remember, the Messiah is called both the son of Yahweh and the son of man. How could this be if a man was not involved in his conception? Yahweh was the father of his spirit and Joseph the father of his body.
5. Y'SHUA DID NOT DIE AS A HUMAN SACRIFICE TO AN ANGRY GOD.
This myth of his death for our salvation also comes from Paganism and was blended in with the teachings of Y'shua. The need for a man to die in our place comes from the erroneous teaching of Saul that we are accounted sinners because of the sin of Adam (our great grandfather). See Ezek.18. We are fallen because of our own personal sins in the heavens in the rebellion, and we must work out our own salvation by repentance and walking righteously before Yahweh. As the scripture says, “Come let us reason together, though thy sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow”.
He was killed, as were thousands of other jews, by being nailed to a pole. This was done as an exaple to others who might rebel against the Roman rule.
It is recorded in the Dead Sea Scrolls, that the Teacher of Righteousness was slain by the Great Liar, whom some believe refers to Saul. We must remember that Saul had papers from the High Priest to kill or imprison followers of the new religion.
IN THE O.T. YAHWEH ABSOLUTELY FORBIDS HUMAN SACRIFICE.
Lev. 18:21 “AND THOU SHALT NOT LET ANY OF THY SEED PASS THROUGH THE FIRE TO MO’-LECH, neither shalt thou profane the name of God: I am the Lord.”
Jer. 32:35, “And they built the high places of Ba’al, which are in the valley of the son of Hin’-nom, TO CAUSE THEIR SONS AND THEIR DAUGHTERS TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE UNTO MO’-LECH; WHICH I COMMANDED THEM NOT, NEITHER CAME IT INTO MY MIND, THAT THEY SHOULD DO THIS ABOMINATION, to cause Judah to sin.”
How could Yahweh have planned the sacrifice of Y'shua if human sacrifice never entered His mind? ARE WE TO BELIEVE THAT YAHWEH ACTUALLY COMMANDED HIS SON TO DIE AS A HUMAN SACRIFICE AFTER CALLING THIS ACT AN ABOMINATION AND A SIN???
DOES THE N.T. SUPPORT THE NEED FOR A BLOOD SACRIFICE?
Matt. 9:12-13, “But when Y'shua heard that, he said unto them, they that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick. But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I WILL HAVE MERCY, AND NOT SACRIFICE: FOR I AM NOT COME TO CALL THE RIGHTEOUS, BUT SINNERS TO REPENTANCE.”
An interestng point in this scripture, is the fact the Y'shua plainly states that not all of the Jews needed saving (repentance) because they already possessed Yahweh's salvation.They had this without Y'shua having to die on the cross.
From the Epistle of Barnabus - “For He hath made manifest to us by all the prophets that He wanteth neither sacrifices nor whole burnt offerings nor oblations, saying at one time; What to Me is the multitude of your sacrifices, saith (Yahweh) I am full of whole burnt-offerings, and the fat of lambs and the blood of bulls and of goats I desire not, not though ye should come to be seen of Me. or who required these things at your hands? Ye shall continue no more to tread My court. If ye bring fine flour, it is in vain; incense is an abomination to Me; your new moons and your Sabbaths I cannot abide. These things therefore He annulled, that the new law of our Lord (Y'shua), being free from the yoke of constraint, might have its oblation not made by human hands. And He saith again unto them; 'Did I command your fathers when they went forth from the land of Egypt to bring Me whole burnt offerings and sacrifices? Nay, this was My command unto them, Let none of you bear a grudge of evil against his neighbor in his heart, and love you not a false oath.' So we ought to perceive, unless we are without understanding, the mind of the goodness of our Father; for He speaketh to us, desiring us not to go astray like them but to seek how we may approach Him. Thus then speaketh He to us; 'The sacrifice unto (Yahweh) is a broken heart, the smell of a sweet savor unto (Him) is a heart that glorifies its Maker.”
DOES THE O.T. SUPPORT BLOOD SACRIFICE?
It is obvious that Yahweh never commanded Israel to offer animals for sacrifices. It appears that he endured their Pagan sacrifices for a while just like he endured us calling Him and Y'shua by pagan names in our ignorance, but he hates it, just like he hated their Sabbaths and their sacrifices and feast days then and now.
Jeremiah 7:21-23, “Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices: but this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you.”
Psa. 51:15-17, “O Lord, open thou my lips; and my mouth shall shew forth thy praise. For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering. The sacrifices of Yahweh are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O Lord, thou wilt not despise.”
Psa. 34:18. “The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit.”
Psa. 50:7-13, “Hear, O my people, and I will speak; O Israel and I will testify against thee: I am God, even thy God. I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings to have been continually before me. I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds. For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine. If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fullness thereof. Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats? Offer unto (Yahweh) thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High:”
Isa. 1: 11-13, “To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and Sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.”
Amos 5:21-23, “I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies. Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept them: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts.”
Psa. 40:6-10, “Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: BURNT OFFERING AND SIN OFFERING HAST THOU NOT REQUIRED. Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me, I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart. I have preached righteousness in the great congregation: lo, I have not refrained my lips, O Lord, thou knowest. I have not hid thy righteousness within my heart; I have declared thy faithfulness and thy salvation: I have not concealed thy loving-kindness and thy truth from the great congregation.” (This is believed to be a prophecy of the coming Messiah).
WE BELIEVE THAT THE SOURCE OF THE BLOOD SACRIFICE TEACHING COMES STRAIGHT FROM PAGANISM.
Prometheus of Greece
“The Greek god Prometheus has been claimed to have come from Egypt, but his drama took place in the Caucasus Mountains. Prometheus shares a number of striking similarities with the Christ character.
• Prometheus descended from heaven as God incarnate as man, to save mankind.
• He was crucified, suffered and rose from the dead.
• He was called the Logos or Word.
“Five centuries before the Christian era, esteemed Greek poet Aeschylus wrote Prometheus Bound, which, according to Taylor, was presented in the theater in Athens. Taylor claims that in the play Prometheus is crucified "on a fatal tree" and the sky goes dark:
"The darkness which closed the scene on the suffering Prometheus, was easily exhibited on the stage, by putting out the lamps; but when the tragedy was to become history, and the fiction to be turned into fact, the lamp of day could not be so easily disposed of. Nor can it be denied that the miraculous darkness which the Evangelists so solemnly declare to have attended the crucifixion of Christ, labours under precisely the same fatality of an absolute and total want of evidence.”
2001 Achaeya S
There is no historical record of an earthquake or an eclipse or any daytime darkness in Israel during the time of the supposed crucifixion.
THERE ARE NO LESS THAN SIXTEEN GOD-MEN REDEEMERS FOUND IN PAGANISM, ALL OF WHOM WERE BORN AROUND OR ON WINTER SOLSTICE DAY, OF A VIRGIN, AND WHO ALSO DIED ON A CROSS AS A BLOOD SACRIFICE FOR THE SALVATION OF THEIR FOLLOWERS.
Y'SHUA CAME TO THE EARTH TO BE THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD, NOT TO DIE AS A HUMAN SACRIFICE TO APPEASE THE VENGEANCE OF AN ANGRY GOD.
Physical, or fleshly, obedience has been replaced by obedience of the heart, leading to perfection, by following Y'shua and his teachings. Rather than trying to atone for sins by killing animals or humans, we are to stop sinning and repent from the heart, obeying laws for our spirit to follow, not just our hands.
In the following scriptures we find that life is received by believing and obeying Y'shua’s teachings rather than being the beneficiaries of his torture and death.
Y'shua states in Matt. 5:17-20, That he upholds the Judaic Law, however according to Saul’s writings in Romans 5:6-11, Y'shua’s death was sacrificial. Now the Judaic law forbade human sacrifice; so if Y'shua’s death was sacrificial then he broke the very Law he said he upheld. Human sacrifice is scripturally untenable. This teaching was added by Saul or the Catholics to God’s word.
Matt. 9:13, “But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”
Heb. 10:5-7, “Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me: In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure.”
IN THE FOLLOWING VERSES, MOSES PROPHESIES THE COMING MESSIAH WHO IS TO BE A PROPHET - NOT A HUMAN SACRIFICE OR GOD IN HUMAN FLESH.
DEUT. 18:18-19 “I WILL RAISE UP FOR THEM A PROPHET LIKE YOU FROM AMONG THEIR BRETHREN, AND WILL PUT MY WORDS IN HIS MOUTH, AND HE SHALL SPEAK TO THEM ALL THAT I COMMAND HIM. AND IT SHALL BE THAT WHOEVER WILL NOT HEAR MY WORDS, WHICH HE SPEAKS IN MY NAME, I WILL REQUIRE IT OF HIM.”
In this scripture, Y'shua is known as a Teacher.
John 3:2, “Rabbi, we know (the Sanhedrin knows) that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except that God be with him.”
In this scripture, Y'shua is known as a Prophet.
Matt. 21:46, “They looked for a way to arrest him, but they were afraid of the crowd because the people held that he was a prophet.”
Matt. 4:17, "From that time (Y'shua) began to preach repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand."
“This Doctrine of the Kingdom of Heaven, which was the main teaching of (Y'shua), and which plays so small a part in the Christian creeds, is certainly one of the most revolutionary doctrines that ever stirred and changed human thought. ...It is small wonder if the hesitating convert and disciple presently went back to the old familiar ideas of temple and altar, of fierce deity and propitiatory observance, of consecrated priest and magic blessing, and-- these things being attended to reverted back to the dear old habitual life of hates and profits and competition and pride. For the doctrine of the Kingdom of Heaven, as (Y'shua) seems to have preached it, was no less than a bold and uncompromising demand for a complete change and cleansing of the life of our struggling race, an utter cleansing, without and within. ...Men belonged to the Kingdom; all their personal possessions belonged to the Kingdom. The righteous life for all men, the only righteous life, was the service of God's will with all that we had, and with all that we were...(Y'shua) had called men and women to a giant undertaking, to the renunciation of self, to the new birth into the kingdom of love.
"The line of least resistance for the flagging convert was to intellectualize himself away from this plain doctrine, this stark proposition, into complicated theories and ceremonies--that would leave his essential self alone. How much easier it is to sprinkle oneself with blood than to purge oneself from malice and competition; to eat bread and drink wine and pretend one had absorbed divinity, to give candles rather than the heart, to shave the head and retain the scheming privacy of the brain inside it!
"...What is clearly apparent is that the teaching of (Y'shua)… was a prophetic teaching of the new type that began with the Hebrew prophets. It was not priestly; it had no consecrated temple and no altar. Its sacrifice was "a broken and contrite heart." Its only organization was an organization of preachers, and its chief function was the sermon. But the fully-fledged Christianity of the fourth century… was mainly a priestly religion of a type already familiar to the world for thousands of years. The centre of its elaborate ritual was an altar, and the essential act of worship the sacrifice, by a consecrated priest, of the mass. And it had a rapidly developing organization of deacons, priests, and bishops. ...Its wide-spread altars were all addressed to the unseen universal Trinity..."
The Outline of History
H. G. Wells
Page 499-523
The Macmillian Co
New York 1921
6. Y'SHUA WAS NOT YAHWEH (GOD) MANIFEST IN A HUMAN BODY.
He was not any part or member or personality of the "Trinity". He was created by Yahweh and Sophia (The Holy Spirit) before the Earth came into existence, just as we were; he was, an UNFALLEN BEING from the origional creation. HE IS WHAT WE WERE BEFORE OUR FALL and subsequent expulsion from the heavens. He is not a third God or a part or personality of God or any part of the Babylonian Trinity.
The Doctrine of the Trinity, which is the cornerstone of modern religion, can be proven to have its roots in Babylon. The Mystery of the Godhead, the three in one, was started by Semiramus when she claimed to be the Holy Spirit (the Queen of Heaven), a third deity to be worshipped along with her husband Nimrod (Baal, the Father), and Tammuz (the Son). We find these three in the Old Testament where Baal worship was forbidden by God, and baking of cakes to the Queen of Heaven and weeping for Tammuz were called abominations by Yahweh and brought swift punishment on all who participated in these horrors.
Summing up the historical evidence, Alvan Lamson says in , "The Church of the First Three Centuries", "The modern popular doctrine of the Trinity derives no support from the language of Justin (Martyr): and this observation may be extended to all the ante-Nicene Fathers; that is, to all Christian writers for three centuries after the birth of Y'shua. It is true; they speak of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but not as co-equal, not as one numerical essence, not as Three in One, in any sense now admitted by Trinitarians. The very reverse is the fact".
Thus, the testimony of the Bible and of history makes clear that the Trinity was unknown throughout Biblical times and for several centuries thereafter.
That Catholics and Protestants and Modern Anabaptists all teach the Trinity of Mystery Babylon is shown below:
“The MYSTERY of the ONE GOD IN THREE DIVINE PERSONS-this, my brethren, is the greatest and most ADORABLE of all our MYSTERIES, because it is the basis, the foundation of the Christian religion.”
The Catechism of Rodez
Abbe’ Lutche. + Louis., pg 19
The ADORABLE Godhead – “We therefore may speak with propriety of the Lord our God, WHO IS ONE LORD, AS A TRINITY OR AS ONE BEING OF THREE PERSONS…”
“…but that this distinction and relationship, as to its mode is inscrutable and incomprehensible, because unexplained.” (Mystery)
Constitution and By-Laws
Assembly of God, Inc., pg. 8
“There is one eternal, self-existing, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, invisible, incomprehensible God, revealing Himself in three persons – Father, Son, and Holy Ghost – THREE IN ONE, ONE IN THREE, coexisting from eternity to eternity.”
Principles of Faith
Church of God in Christ, Mennonite, pg. 5
Did the Early Church teach the Trinity? Note the following comments by historians and early theologians.
“Primitive Christianity did not have an explicit doctrine of the Trinity such as was subsequently elaborated in the creeds.” The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology
“There is no evidence that any sacred writer even suspected the existence of a (Trinity) within the Godhead.” The Triune God
Origen, who died about 250 AD, said that "the Father and Son are two substances, two things as to their essence," and that "compared with the Father, (the Son) is a very small light."
"Justin Martyr, who died about 165 AD, called the prehuman Y'shua a created angel who is "other than the God who made all things" He said that (Y'shua) was inferior to God and "never did anything except what the Creator willed him to do and say."
Irenaeus, who died about 200 AD, said that the prehuman (Y'shua) had a separate existence from God and was inferior to him. He showed that (Y'shua) is not equal to the "One true and only God", who is "supreme over all and besides whom there is no other."
Clement of Alexandria, who died about 215 AD, called (Y'shua) in his prehuman existence "a creature" but called God "the uncreated and imperishable and only true God." He said that the Son "is next to the only omnipotent Father" but not equal to him.
Tertullian, who died about 230 AD, taught the supremacy of God. He observed: "The Father is different from the Son (another), as he is greater; as he who begets is different from him who is begotten; he who sends is different from him who is sent". He also said: "There was a time when the Son was not. Before all things, God was alone".
Hippolytus, who died about 235 AD, said that God is "the one God, the first and the only One, the Maker and Lord of all," who "had nothing co-eval [of equal age] with him. But he was One, alone by himself; who, willing it, called into being what had no being before"..
(The "Trinity" that is taught today is a veiled version of the teaching that was brought into the church at the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D., when Constantine accepted the Egyptian Godhead message, which is, of course, the Babylonian Trinity.)
"These facts speak for themselves. Our Greek texts, not only of the Gospels, but of the Epistles as well, have been revised and interpolated by orthodox copyists. We can trace their perversions of the text in a few cases, with the aid of patristic citations and ancient versions. But there must remain many passages which have been so corrected, but where we cannot today expose the fraud. It was necessary to emphasize this point, because Drs. Westcott and Hort used to aver that there is no evidence of merely doctrinal changes having been made into the text of the New Testament. This is just the opposite of the truth, and such distinguished scholars as Alfred Loisy, J. Wellhausen, Everhard Nestle, Adolf Harnack, to mention only four names, do not scruple to recognize the fact."
(Conybeare)
"The Greek MSS. of the text of the New Testament were often: altered by scribes, who put into them the readings which were familiar to them, and which they held to be the right readings." (Dr. C. R. Gregory, Canon and Text of the N.T. 1907, p. 424)
"Codex B. (Vaticanus) would be the best of all existing MSS... if it were completely preserved, less damaged, (less) corrected, more easily legible, and not altered by a later hand in more than two thousand places. Eusebius, therefore, is not without grounds for accusing the adherents of Athanasius and of the newly-arisen doctrine of the Trinity of falsifying the Bible more than once." (Trans.from Christadelphian Monatshefte.)
"WE CERTAINLY KNOW OF A GREATER NUMBER OF INTERPOLATIONS AND CORRUPTIONS BROUGHT INTO THE SCRIPTURES ... BY THE ATHANASIANS, AND RELATING TO THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY, THAN IN ANY OTHER CASE WHATSOEVER. While we have not, that I know of, any such interpolation or corruption, made in anyone of them by either the Eusebians or Arians." (Second letter to the Bishop of London, 1719, p.15.) Whiston.
In his book "The Triune God," Jesuit Edmund Fortman admits: "The Old Testament tells us nothing explicitly or by necessary implication of a Triune God who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit. There is no evidence that any sacred writer even suspected the existence of a ‘Trinity’ within the Godhead... Even to see in the ‘Old Testament’ suggestions or foreshadowings or 'veiled signs' of the trinity of persons, is to go beyond the words and intent of the sacred writers."
Jesuit Fortman also states: "The New Testament writers give us no formal or formulated doctrine of the Trinity, no explicit teaching that in one God there are three co-equal divine persons. Nowhere do we find any Trinitarian doctrine of three distinct subjects of divine life and activity in the same Godhead."
The Encyclopedia of Religion says: “Theologians agree that the New Testament also does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity."
The New Encyclopedia Britannica observes: "Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament"
Bernhard Lohse says in A Short History of Christian Doctrine, "As far as the New Testament is concerned, one does not find in it an actual doctrine of the Trinity."
The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, similarly states: "The N[ew] T[estament] does not contain the developed doctrine of the Trinity.’ The Bible lacks the express declaration that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are of equal essence' [said Protestant theologian Karl Barth]."
Yale University professor E. Washburn Hopkins affirmed: "To (Y'shua) and Saul the doctrine of the trinity was apparently unknown; they say nothing about it. “Origin and Evolution of Religion"
Historian Arthur Weigall, notes: "The Messiah never mentioned such a phenomenon, and nowhere in the New Testament does the word 'Trinity' appear.” "The Paganism in Our Christianity"
"The early Christians, however, did not at first think of applying the [Trinity] idea to their own faith. They paid their devotions to Yahweh the Father and to (Y'shua), the Son of Yahweh, and they recognized the Holy Spirit; but there was no thought of these three being an actual Trinity, co-equal and united in One." The Paganism in Our Christianity
"At first the Christian faith was not Trinitarian. It was not so in the apostolic and sub-apostolic ages, as reflected in the N[ew] T[estament] and other early Christian writings." Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics
"The formulation 'one God in three Persons' was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective." New Catholic Encyclopedia
“Justin Martyr is quoted by Eusebius, ‘He also cites some passages from the prophets, proving against Trypho that THE JEWS HAD ACTUALLY CUT THEM OUT OF THE SCRIPTURES.’"
“Eusebius also quotes Dionysius, "When my fellow Christians invited me to write letters to them I did so. These the devil's apostles have filled with tares, taking away some things and adding others. For them the woe is reserved. Small wonder then if some have dared TO TAMPER EVEN WITH THE WORD OF THE LORD HIMSELF, when they have conspired to mutilate my own humble efforts."
The History of the Church from Christ to Constantine
Eusibius
325 A.D. Pages 180, 185
It is obvious to any honest heart that the purpose of introducing the Doctrine of the Trinity was simply the re-introduction of the Babylonian Pagan Deities of Nimrod, Tamuz and Semiramus in the guise of The Father, Son and the Holy Spirit of God. Thus the head of the Pagan Beast which was wounded now lives again wearing the name of New Testament Christianity.
"... At the Council of Nice, (Nicea 325 A.D.) says the author of 'Nimrod,' 'The Melchite section' - that is, the representatives of the so-called Christianity of Egypt - 'held that there were three persons in the Trinity, The Father, the Virgin Mary, and Messiah their Son.'..."
"...This astounding language manifestly implies that Mary is identified with the Holy Spirit, when it speaks of her 'being poured out' on 'all the works of Yahweh;”
"Now the Holy Ghost was idolatrously worshipped in Babylon under the form of a 'Dove'. Under the same form, and with equal idolatry, the Holy Ghost is worshipped in Rome."
The Two Babylons (p. 144)
Alex. Hislop
Loizeaux Brothers
Neptune N.J. 1916
We find these three pagan deities under different names throughout history:
Babylonian: Nimrod Semiramis - The Dove Osiris
Old Testament: Baal Queen of Heaven - Ashtoreth Tammuz
Catholic Trinity: The Father Mary - The Dove Jesus
(Also see Jer. 7:1-20; Ezek. 8:14-15; Jer. 44:17-27; Gen. 10:8-10; Rev. 18:2-5; Judges 2:13-14; 1 Kings 18:21-22.). See “The Two Babylon’s” By Alexander Hislop for an in depth study on The Pagan Deities.
In 1 Tim. 2:5, we find, "For there is one God, and one mediator between Yahweh and men, the man (Y'shua);” THIS SCRIPTURE MENTIONS THE ONE ETERNAL GOD IN WHOM WE MOST DEFINITELY BELIEVE; HOWEVER, IT ALSO MENTIONS THE MEDIATOR, Y'SHUA, WHO MEDIATES BETWEEN YAHWEH AND MAN. 1 JOHN 2:1 SAYS THAT Y'SHUA IS WITH THE FATHER AND IS OUR ADVOCATE. SO WE FIND THAT 1 TIM. 2:5 MOST ASSUREDLY PROVES TWO SEPARATE BEINGS, ONE SUPREME DEITY YAHWEH, AND ONE MEDIATOR, Y'SHUA.
In 1 Tim. 3:16, in the KJV, we find, "...(god) was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." (Actually in 1 Tim 3:16, the KJV mistranslates the word "He" as god, the word "He" is, of course, referring to Y'shua and not Yahweh) If, as many teach, 1 Tim. 3:16 is referring to the one and only deity being manifest in the flesh, then why did He have to be justified and who received Him into glory? (Isaac Newton wrote that this scripture along with 1John 5:7 were corrupted.)
To those who would argue that John 10:30 proves that Yahweh and the Messiah are one and the same God: I WOULD ASK THEM, WHY DOESN'T JOHN 17:11, AND JOHN 17:21-22 MAKE US ALSO ONE GOD? John 17:11, "...that they may be one as we are one." John 17:21-22, "That they all may be one; as thou, Father, are in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: That the world may believe that thou hast sent me.”
There is one God; however, we do find TWO Lords in the following scriptures. Zech. 3:2; Gen. 19:24; Psa. 110:1; Acts 2:34; Matt. 22:43-44; Jude 4; Heb. 1:8-10.
In Rev. 1:8, Y'shua is called the Almighty. The word translated Almighty is translated "Sovereign Lord" in the New English Bible. All of these terms simply prove that He is Lord, which we certainly accept as fact. However, none of these things can, by any stretch of the imagination, be used to prove that Yahweh and Y'shua are one and the same being. If men want to believe the trinity fairy-tale, then they must stand on tradition alone. Matt. 15:1-9; Mark 7:8-9; 7:13; Col. 2:8
If the Trinity is true, how do we answer the following?
How does Yahweh have more power than Y'shua? Matt. 20:23, “but to sit on my right hand or my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my father." Also see Acts 1:6-7.
How can Yahweh know something that Y'shua does not know?
Mark 13:32, "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father." Also see Acts 1:6-7.
How can Yahweh be GREATER than Y'shua? John 14:28, "...for my Father is greater than I." 1 Cor. 11:3, "...the head of Y'shua is Yahweh." Also see, 1 Cor. 3:23; 15:24-28; 6:14; John 10:17-18; 10:36; 12:49; 17:5; Heb. 5:8-9; 10:5; 9:24; Rev. 3:14.
How could we do GREATER works than Y'shua if he is God?
How could Y'shua have glory WITH Yahweh before the world was? John 17:5.
How could this one God be HIS own heir? Heb. 1:2; Rom. 8:17.
How could the Church be in TWO, Yahweh AND Y'shua? 1 Thess. 1:1.
Why did Peter teach TWO LORDS in Acts 2:31-36? Also 1 Pet.1: 3.
Why did James salute TWO in the first sentence of his epistle?
Why did John speak of men hiding from the wrath of TWO in Rev. 6:16-17?
If Y'shua is the same being, the same substance as Yahweh, which is the basis of Trinitarianism and Oneness, then how could He be tempted with sin? James 1:13, "...for Yahweh CANNOT be TEMPTED with evil."
In Luke 4:1-2, "And Y'shua being full of the Holy Spirit returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Being 40 days TEMPTED of the devil." In Heb. 4:15, "For we have not a high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points TEMPTED like as we are, yet without sin." Also see, Isa. 28:16; Luke 22:42-44.
If Yahweh is one being, how could one send the other? Isa. 48:16; Hos. 1:7; John 8:42; 6:38; 10:36; 12:49; Gal. 4:6; 1 John 4:14.
There has to be at least TWO LORDS, because one of them repents and the other one does not. Num. 23:19, Yahweh is not a man...neither the Son of man that He should repent. James 1:17, Yahweh is the father of lights in whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. YAHWEH IS IMMUTABLE - HE CHANGES NOT. EXOD, 32:14; 2 SAM. 24:16, THE LORD (Y'SHUA) REPENTED. (He changed His mind).
Do you really believe that Y'shua created himself, sent himself, anointed himself, prayed to himself, obeyed himself, received himself into heaven and then set himself at his own right hand in order to mediate with himself in our behalf?
If the Father and the Son are just two different manifestations of the one indivisible God, how could He love each other? John 14:31, Y'shua loves the Father. In John 3:35 and in John 10:17, The Father loves Y'shua.
In John 8:19, "...Y'shua answered, ye neither know me, nor my Father..."
In the Bible, Y'shua distinguished between Yahweh and Himself 110 times; He spoke of Yahweh as His Father 181 times. Yahweh distinguished between Himself and Y'shua 10 times in the New Testament. Demons distinguished between Yahweh and Y'shua 10 times in the New Testament. The Disciples distinguished between Yahweh and Yeshua 85 times. Y'shua is called the son of man eighty-five times in the scriptures. He is called the Son of Yahweh forty times. He never once claims to be Yahweh, but rather calls himself a Son of Yahweh and a son of man (Joseph). It is our belief that Y'shua was the Teacher of Righteousness revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
IN THE FOLLOWING SCRIPTURES IT IS PLAIN THAT TWO DIFFERENT BEINGS ARE REFERRED TO:
YAHWEH LORD YESHUA
(Deut. 33:27) (Isa. 9:6)
John 14:23 We We
John 17:11 We We
Zech. 6:12-13 Both Both
John 15:24 Both Both
2 John 9 Both Both
Jude 4 Lord God Lord Yeshua
Acts 2:34 Lord Lord
Matt. 22:43-44 Lord Lord
John 14:1 God Me
I Cor. 8:6 1 God 1 Lord
Eph. 5:20 God Lord
Eph. 4:5-6 1 God 1 Lord
Eph. 1:3 God Lord
Isa. 42:1 God's Soul
Matt. 12:18 God's Soul
Isa. 53:10-12 Son’s Soul
Acts 2:27-31 Son’s Soul
Matt. 27:46-50 God Me
Dan. 7:13-14 Ancient of Days Son of Man
Acts 7:55-56 God Y'shua
Heb. 9:24 God Y'shua
John 7:17 God Myself
Luke 9:26 God's Glory Y'shua's Glory
Amos 4:11 God I
Josh. 5:13-15 Lord's Host I Captain
Lam. 4:20 Lord is Anointed
Psa. 2:7 Lord Me
Psa. 2:6 I King (past tense)
Matt. 25:34 Father King
Mark 5:7 God Y'shua
John 5:26 Father Son
John 5:23 Father Son
Rom. 8:9 Spirit of God Spirit of Y'shua
Isa. 52:12 God (Rear Guard) Lord (goes before)
Hab. 3:3 God Holy One
The lawful claim of Y'shua to the throne of David lies in the fact that while before his human birth he was Yahweh’s begotten Son, he was nevertheless Joseph and Mary's (and therefore David's) Son from his human birth. The fact, however, that even now in heaven he is still David's seed, gives him legal right, as a direct and lawful descendant of David to return and take David's Throne. These facts preclude any possibility of Unitarianism or Trinitarianism being true, as both of these teachings require Yahweh to have manifested Himself only temporarily as the Son.
HE THAT DENIES THE FATHER AND THE SON IS ANTI-CHRIST, (not he who denies the Trinity). I John 2:22; 2 John 9, 11; I John 4:3.
In John 14:1, in the Greek, “Let not your hearts be troubled; believe in Yahweh, believe also in me." Also see John 6:28-30.
"Arianism is the name given to the doctrine of the (Messiah) advocated by Arius and his followers. It contained nothing essentially new, but it crystallized certain modes and tendencies of thought which had been more or less prevalent in the church for three or four generations." (This plainly dates Arianism to Apostolic times.)
The Encyclopedia Americana, Vol. 2
Americana Corporation
"The Church of Rome is not idolatrous, unless Arianism is orthodoxy."
Father Newman,
The Two Babylons, (page 82)
Alexander Hislop
The Doctrine of The Messiah presented above is the same doctrine that was taught at the dawn of the Church by the Apostles. It is called Arianism because of the man, named Arius, who stood up in the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D. and promoted the truth, by standing against the PAGAN DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY, WHICH WAS SWEEPING THROUGH THE APOSTATIZING CHURCH.
7. YAHWEH IS THE SAVIOR.
YAHWEH CALLED MEN WHOM HE SENT TO HELP ISRAEL “SAVIORS” IN BOTH THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS, BUT THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD WHO IS THE SAVIOR OF MEN, EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING YESHUA IS A MESSENGER.
Isa. 45: 21, “Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? Who hath told it from that time? Have not I the Lord? AND THERE IS NO GOD ELSE BESIDE ME; A JUST GOD AND A SAVIOR; THERE IS NONE BESIDE ME.”
Isa. 43:11, “I, even I, am the Lord; and BESIDE ME THERE IS NO SAVIOR.”
Hosea 13: 4, “Yet I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: FOR THERE IS NO SAVIOR BESIDE ME.”
Jude 1: 25, “TO THE ONLY WISE GOD OUR SAVIOR, BE GLORY AND MAJESTY, DOMINION AND POWER, BOTH NOW AND EVER. “
Luke 1: 47, “And my spirit hath rejoiced in GOD MY SAVIOR.”
1 Tim 4: 10, “For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living GOD, WHO IS THE SAVIOR of all men, especially of those that believe.”
Titus 1: 3, “But hath in due times manifested his word through preaching, which is committed unto me according to the commandment of GOD OUR SAVIOR;”
Titus 2: 10, “Not purloining, but shewing all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of GOD OUR SAVIOR in all things.”
Isa.49: 26, “And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine: and all flesh shall know that I THE LORD AM THY SAVIOR AND THY REDEEMER, THE MIGHTY ONE OF JACOB.”
Titus 3: 4, “But after that the kindness and love of GOD OUR SAVIOR toward man appeared”
Isa. 60: 16, “Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I THE LORD AM THY SAVIOR AND THY REDEEMER, THE MIGHTY ONE OF JACOB.”
1 Tim. 2: 3, “For this is good and acceptable in the sight of GOD OUR SAVIOR;”
THE TRUTH, THEN, IS THAT Y'SHUA IS FROM THE UNFALLEN, HEAVENLY WORLD, AND HE IS LORD. HOWEVER, HE IS NOT THE SAVIOR, HE IS NOT GOD; HE IS NOT A MEMBER OF THE BABYLONIAN TRINITY. Y'SHUA HIMSELF CALLS US HIS BRETHREN IN MATT. 25:40, JOHN 20:17.
HE WAS NOT GOD. HE WAS NOT BORN OF A VIRGIN. HE WAS NOT CRUCIFIED AS A HUMAN SACRIFICE TO AN ANGRY GOD, NEITHER WAS HIS DEAD BODY RESURRECTED (THOUGH HE WAS SEEN IN HIS SPIRIT BODY. IF YOU REMEMBER, MARY DID NOT RECOGNIZE HIM UNTIL HE SPOKE). THESE THINGS BEING TRUE, IT THEN FOLLOWS THAT ALL THE SCRIPTURES PROMOTING YESHUA AS THE CRUCIFIED AND RESURRECTED GOD (ZEUS) ARE CATHOLIC DECEPTIONS, PUT INTO THE SCRIPTURES TO DECEIVE YAHWEH'S PEOPLE AND TO RESTORE PAGANISM, WHICH THING THEY HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IN BOTH CATHOLICISM AND PROTESTANTISM. THE CATHOLICS HID THE BIBLE FOR OVER A THOUSAND YEARS; THEY HAD A LONG TIME TO CORRUPT IT AND TAKE Y'SHUA OUT AND PUT HA-ZEUS (JE-SUS) IN.
THESE HORRIBLE DECEPTIONS PUT FORTH BY SATANS FALSE CHURCH HAVE DECEIVED MILLIONS WHO BELIEVE THEY ARE SAVED BY THE SACRIFICE OF A GOD-MAN WHO, IN FACT, NEVER EXISTED.
IF WE WOULD SEE HEAVEN WE MUST STOP GOING TO PAGAN TEMPLES AND WORSHIPPING ZEUS (JESUS). WE MUST REPENT OF OUR IDOLATRY AND GIVE OUR LIVES TO YAHWEH AND FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS OF HIS SON Y'SHUA.
SATAN'S MASTERPIECE.
